Last time, I pointed out how some writers worry that the cure for a common enemy of critical thinking (disinformation) might be worse...

How can we balance logos, pathos and ethos to make choices most likely to persuade others to do the right thing?

Ethos creates a bond between a speaker and an audience, one that can be based on empathy or tribalism.

Is there a role for emotion when trying to think critically?

A reasonable argument can fail to persuade due to too much reliance on logos (logic)

Introducing Aristotle's modes of persuasion: logos, pathos and ethos, and the role they play in critical thinking.